Zuwharrie.Com BBS
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
Monday, March 22, 2010, 09:43:59 AM
Search:    
Need help with the Zuwharrie online store? PM ronin
* Home | Help | Search | Calendar | Login | Register | Zuwharrie.Com
+  Zuwharrie.Com BBS
|-+  Suzuki Technical
| |-+  Samurai Tech (Moderators: GeneralChaos, † Ţanzer †)
| | |-+  The newest project.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15 16 ... 68 | Go Down Print
Author Topic: The newest project.  (Read 74396 times)
Cabie
Trail Leader
****
Offline

Loc: Sebago Lake, Maine
Joined Dec 2004


« Reply #195 on: Sunday, September 18, 2005, 07:14:31 PM »

Rockrat, you have side picture of the panhard upper mount in relation to the shock mount. 

Also what angle is the bend in the shock mount?  Better yet how far is it offset at the bottom of the frame from the top?  Now in theory isn't that placing the shockmount in double shear?  Structurally as strong at the frame front to back as up to down.

How tall is the mount? how far out from the frame is it??

Sorry for all the questions.
Logged
rockrat
Event Sponsor
*
Offline

Loc: Winthrop Harbor Ill
Joined Feb 2003



« Reply #196 on: Sunday, September 18, 2005, 08:21:27 PM »

Rockrat, you have side picture of the panhard upper mount in relation to the shock mount. 

Also what angle is the bend in the shock mount?  Better yet how far is it offset at the bottom of the frame from the top?  Now in theory isn't that placing the shockmount in double shear?  Structurally as strong at the frame front to back as up to down.

How tall is the mount? how far out from the frame is it??

Sorry for all the questions.

Not sure at what you are getting at but to answer the questions
From the top of frame to shock eye 7" offset from frame 3.5" angle of bend 35deg aksi it is hard to see in the pic but the shock mounts are reasesed to have 3/8" that is overhanging the top of the frame.
Logged

Click banner and go to Store Tab
isbb
Zukaholic
*******
Offline

Loc: Las Vegas, NV
Joined Oct 2004


« Reply #197 on: Sunday, September 18, 2005, 08:30:01 PM »

Cabie theres nuttin wrong with double shear mounts.. :D  Its single shear mounts you gotta worry about... I was looking at how tall they are and when the axle decides it wants to move fowards or backwards or start to wrap the shocks will want to wrap them mounts.. :D  but we shall see... Rockrat says it will work it will work.. :D 

i wouldnt imagine the offset being no more than a inch inand a half if i think i know what you mean by offset..
Logged
rockrat
Event Sponsor
*
Offline

Loc: Winthrop Harbor Ill
Joined Feb 2003



« Reply #198 on: Sunday, September 18, 2005, 09:37:38 PM »

Cabie theres nuttin wrong with double shear mounts.. :D  Its single shear mounts you gotta worry about... I was looking at how tall they are and when the axle decides it wants to move fowards or backwards or start to wrap the shocks will want to wrap them mounts.. :D  but we shall see... Rockrat says it will work it will work.. :D 

i wouldnt imagine the offset being no more than a inch inand a half if i think i know what you mean by offset..

Should not be any axle wrap, it is linked suspension..
Logged

Click banner and go to Store Tab
rockrat
Event Sponsor
*
Offline

Loc: Winthrop Harbor Ill
Joined Feb 2003



« Reply #199 on: Thursday, September 22, 2005, 12:55:56 AM »

Ok the shocks are on rear shaft on and it sits on its own. Oh and flex's
pics coming

Logged

Click banner and go to Store Tab
rockrat
Event Sponsor
*
Offline

Loc: Winthrop Harbor Ill
Joined Feb 2003



« Reply #200 on: Thursday, September 22, 2005, 01:12:22 AM »

Ride height next to a stock zuk




And the test and FAIL





Logged

Click banner and go to Store Tab
NC Zuk
Box of Rocks!
Zu Keeper
*
Offline

Loc: Heaven


Can't keep the monkey off my back!


« Reply #201 on: Thursday, September 22, 2005, 07:35:50 AM »

Fail? What failed? Otherwise it is shaping up! 8)
Logged

I am your flag; I was born on June 14th, 1777.  I am the refuge of the world’s oppressed people. I am the silent sentinel of freedom.
rockrat
Event Sponsor
*
Offline

Loc: Winthrop Harbor Ill
Joined Feb 2003



« Reply #202 on: Thursday, September 22, 2005, 09:55:26 AM »

YA the flex is great and Even but I (FD) up big time with my mock up of the shocks so the tower is not tall enough. No usable up travel and it Will bottom out so guess I will be cutting off my new mounts to make them taller. Only one place to go, and that is throught the fenderwell. Oh well.
Logged

Click banner and go to Store Tab
Orionn
Zukaholic
*******
Offline

Loc: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Joined Jun 2004



« Reply #203 on: Thursday, September 22, 2005, 10:36:01 AM »

well that stinks...... :( Looking back now that you said that, the tires dont really stuff like you would think.  that should be an easy fix for you though.  ;D

Looks great though Scott, as always. 
« Last Edit: Thursday, September 22, 2005, 10:37:08 AM by Orionn » Logged

;D Vehicular Packrat ;D
samerrant
I live here!
*******
Offline

Loc: Vancouver, B.C. Can
Joined Oct 2004


« Reply #204 on: Thursday, September 22, 2005, 11:38:12 AM »

scott, the arms are long enough that it may not be an issue, but have you not had any issues with excessive anti squat running a setup like that, essentially radius arms rather than a 4 link?
build quality, as expected looks great.

thanks for any info
Logged
Zukisam
Dr. Off-Road
*****
Offline

Loc: Camp Bucca Prison, Iraq
Joined May 2005


« Reply #205 on: Thursday, September 22, 2005, 12:31:12 PM »

YA the flex is great and Even but I (FD) up big time with my mock up of the shocks so the tower is not tall enough. No usable up travel and it Will bottom out so guess I will be cutting off my new mounts to make them taller. Only one place to go, and that is throught the fenderwell. Oh well.

I din'nt read every reply so I'm guessing 33 inchers. If you increase the up-travel will you be able to use a 35in or...........?  also the work is incredible, Im going to welding school for the Army next month and hope to learn more than just my current arc welding skills ;D
Logged

There is no substitute for cubic inches, or in this case... cubic centimeters. Sammi's rule!!!
rockrat
Event Sponsor
*
Offline

Loc: Winthrop Harbor Ill
Joined Feb 2003



« Reply #206 on: Thursday, September 22, 2005, 03:24:08 PM »

scott, the arms are long enough that it may not be an issue, but have you not had any issues with excessive anti squat running a setup like that, essentially radius arms rather than a 4 link?
build quality, as expected looks great.

thanks for any info

The truck is being built for more street handling, and be able to say run the baja. Antisquat is the least of the issues. All of which can be easily corrected with a center strap. My fears with only 2" of up travel is that since the shock is also the effective spring with one real good hit bottoming will cause damage to the frame, shock mounts and shocks themselves. The suspension has a usable amount3-4" up and I need to utilize it to get a a great handling rig. This is not a rockcrawler and is not going to be one. Goals 75mph hwy, with no vibes and good road manors, then if I want to fly theough the dessert whoops etc it will handle it.
Logged

Click banner and go to Store Tab
rockrat
Event Sponsor
*
Offline

Loc: Winthrop Harbor Ill
Joined Feb 2003



« Reply #207 on: Thursday, September 22, 2005, 03:27:30 PM »

I din'nt read every reply so I'm guessing 33 inchers. If you increase the up-travel will you be able to use a 35in or...........?  also the work is incredible, Im going to welding school for the Army next month and hope to learn more than just my current arc welding skills ;D

The tires that are on it now are a toyo 31" that measure around a 30". Yes an easy fix would be to add more nitrogen to the shock and just raise the ride height. But the key to this build is low and effective. I could easily with this kit run 31-35" tire without issues, but as the truck goes up the more unstable it could be at hwy speed.
Logged

Click banner and go to Store Tab
dbs2071
Sr. Wheeler
******
Offline

Loc: Chino Hills, So. Cal
Joined Apr 2005


« Reply #208 on: Thursday, September 22, 2005, 04:06:09 PM »

The truck is being built for more street handling, and be able to say run the baja. Antisquat is the least of the issues. All of which can be easily corrected with a center strap. My fears with only 2" of up travel is that since the shock is also the effective spring with one real good hit bottoming will cause damage to the frame, shock mounts and shocks themselves. The suspension has a usable amount3-4" up and I need to utilize it to get a a great handling rig. This is not a rockcrawler and is not going to be one. Goals 75mph hwy, with no vibes and good road manors, then if I want to fly theough the dessert whoops etc it will handle it.

That is precisely what I wanted in my zuk.  I spend 100% of my offroad driving in the So Cal desert and would like to get a lot more up travel to handle the bumps and whoops.  I got a softer ride with the TTYJ kit but I don't think it is going to help a lot with the higher speed driving in the desert.  It seems most of the suspension kits are designed more for rock crawling.  I'll be waiting anxiously to see how you set up works.  Nice looking work by the way.
Logged

terrymac
Zuki Wannabe
*
Offline

Joined Jul 2005


« Reply #209 on: Thursday, September 22, 2005, 04:25:54 PM »

Scott,

I just flipped through this thread build quickly and don't recall what the drivetrain is other than Toy axles. What engine, trans and t-case setup?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15 16 ... 68 | Go Up Print 
« previous next »
 


Copyright © 2002-2010 Zuwharrie Off-Road Events, LLC.. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction is strictly forbidden. Legal Info


Powered by SMF 2.0 Beta 2.1 | SMF © 2006–2008, Simple Machines LLC
Zuwharrie Off-Road Events, LLC Disclaimer: Views expressed in Zuwharrie.Com's open forum are from private individuals and do not in any way reflect the views of the Zuwharrie event, it's planners, Zuwharrie.Com, or the Zuwharrie.Com staff. Activities and vehicle modifications described or displayed in this publication and it's pages may be potentially dangerous. Zuwharrie.Com does not endorse or make any claims to their safety or performance. [MORE]
Page created in 0.318 seconds with 16 queries.    Load Average: 0.03